The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant set up a vehicle at one place without managing or operating at all the vehicles which have been laid off between several months, and there was a seizure of approximately 40 conditions on the original register of the automobile registration, and thus, it constitutes the "act of failing to leave the vehicle on the road continuously" under Article 26 (1) 2 of the Automobile Management Act, but the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the owner of a vehicle with Crails.

From September 2010 to January 10, 201, the Defendant left the vehicle on the back side (F) of the oil station located in the Gu-gu E during the period of Ansan-si from around the date of 2010 to around January 10, 201.

B. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances, which can be seen by the court below based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, and the defendant argues that the vehicle of this case was parked in the company near the company and not left alone only in the company where it was parked in the parking line with approximately 100 meters away from the company where the defendant was accompanying, and that the vehicle of this case was parked in the parking line except for the problem of 100 meters away from the company where the defendant was parked in the road without any special management act.