The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year and eight months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected, and the amount of damage is relatively high.

It is advantageous to the fact that it is not visible.

However, there is a history of punishment for the defendant, such as punishment, suspension of execution, and fine, due to the same or a different type of crime, and the fact that the defendant again commits the crime of this case without being aware of it during the period of repeated crime, and some victims who did not recover from damage, and want to punish the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and other conditions of sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.