1. The Defendant’s KRW 172,700,000 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from October 31, 2014 to July 6, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 29, 2014, the Plaintiff received a contract from the Defendant from the Defendant during the period from July 29, 2014 to July 31, 2014, for a sampling project of 2 partitionss (hereinafter referred to as “dypryp site construction”) among the 152,00,000 won in construction cost, and construction period from July 30, 2014 to August 31, 2014.

(hereinafter referred to as "dypium construction contract"). (b)

Among the matters stipulated in the special agreement of the sampling construction contract, the major contents of the agreement related to this case shall be as follows:

1.The terms of this Agreement shall prevail over the standard terms of the contract.

5. The quality of the Corporation shall be as follows: A (the defendant is named; hereinafter the same shall apply) and B (the plaintiff is named; hereinafter the same shall apply) shall make its best efforts to improve the quality of the project, subject to consultation between B and B (the plaintiff is named; hereinafter the same shall apply).

“B” shall complete the responsibility.

6. The term "B" means a guarantee for the completion of responsibilities as a contract performance bond;

“A” shall be submitted to A within five days after completion.

8. (1) The settlement of construction expenses shall be completed.

(3) The settlement of construction expenses shall be calculated through the appraisal of completed construction works and shall be paid after completion.

10. Since this construction is composed of two partitionss, it shall settle the actual cost and then calculate and adjust the actual price thereafter.

11. If “B” fails to or ceases construction within a time limit, the daily amount of KRW 150 million shall be deducted from the contract amount of “B”.

“B” does not bring any civil or criminal action or objection.

12. The first bidder shall be appointed for all master crafts and interior works of the first floor.

C. During the process of sampling construction, the Plaintiff additionally implemented the Defendant’s office interior works located on the second floor of the instant burial (hereinafter “office construction”) at the Defendant’s request (hereinafter “office construction”) and the sampling and the office construction (hereinafter “instant construction”).

[Reasons for Recognition]