A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 9, 2013, from around 22:20 on the same day to 23:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to a large number of customers, without any justifiable reason, who are working for the victim D, located in Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon; and (b) took a bath to a large amount of customers at the same place, namely, “Chewing, bitbit of a bitch, bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bit

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's bar business by force.

2. At around 23:35 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed that he was asked questions about the case from G in the circumstances where he was dispatched after having received 112 report that he was frighting the above fright; and (b) expressed that “I am frighting fright, why I am fright, and why I am fright.” The Defendant assaulted G face on one occasion and his face with his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to G, D, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing field photographs attached to the investigation report;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment with labor for more than one year);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1320, Jan. 1, 2

1. The summary of assault among the facts charged in the instant case involving the dismissal of prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is to listen to the statement that “I have to take a large amount of drinking alcohol, so I have to take a bath against the victim H (the age of 21) around December 23:30, 2013.”