The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). As no new data on sentencing have been submitted at the trial court, there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the lower court’s judgment, and the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as unfair reasons for sentencing are deemed to have already been reflected in the sentencing grounds of the lower court. In full view of the following: (a) the amount obtained by the instant case is too small; (b) the damage has not been recovered; (c) the damage has not been agreed with the victim; and (d) other various circumstances, including the motive, means, and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the lower court cannot be deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion because

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.