1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial revision as follows. Thus, the reasoning of the court of first instance cites it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be corrected;

A. On the fourth 18-19 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “ alone the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff” is amended to “the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff” to the following: (a) each description and image of Nos. 1 through 12 (including paper numbers); and (b) fact-finding reply to the party-review system chain business corporation.”

B. Of the sixth page of the judgment of the court of first instance, “All 15-19 acts” is amended to “the materials submitted by the plaintiffs to support their claims or the fact-finding reply to the fact-finding system business corporation at the time of the instant charging station alone. It is difficult to conclude that the amount of the inventories of liquefied petroleum gas actually stored in the instant charging station, or the amount of the subsequent storage and sale after them are measured and sold without any omission, and that the guidance surveying also coincide with the quantity that the Plaintiffs are premised on the aforementioned assertion.”

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims in this case are dismissed as they are without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified with this conclusion, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.