logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.09.06 2017나64773
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Under Article 10 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”), the Plaintiff is a special corporation established with the aim of compensating employees for occupational accidents promptly and fairly by being entrusted with the industrial accident compensation insurance business by the Minister of Employment and Labor, establishing and operating insurance facilities necessary to facilitate the rehabilitation of workers suffering from occupational accidents and their return to society, and contributing to the protection of workers by carrying out disaster prevention projects and workers’ welfare promotion projects.

B. On November 20, 2014, B, as a taxi driver belonging to the Young-gu High-Speed of a limited company (hereinafter “Yjin-gu”), was driving a taxi belonging to the said company at around 04:10 on November 20, 2014, while driving a taxi belonging to the said company, Gwangju Seo-gu, driving the taxi at one-lane from the teachers’ Mutual Aid Association to the luminous one intersection as the luminous one intersection as the luminous one.

C. Meanwhile, while under the influence of alcohol in the above temporary border, A was driving a vehicle E owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant A”), the front part of B’s vehicle, which was stopped beyond the central line, was driven in front of the instant A’s vehicle while driving the vehicle as a e-vehicle owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant A-Wed vehicle”), driving as the front part of the instant A-Wed vehicle into one-lane from the e-1st intersection of Gwangju Seo-gu as a teacher’

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

B was injured due to the instant accident, and the said accident in B fell under occupational accidents, and the Plaintiff paid the insurance benefits prescribed in the Industrial Accident Compensation Act to B, and the detailed details are as follows.

B [Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9 (including a tentative number, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The relevant Acts and subordinate statutes shall be as listed in the attached Form.

3. The parties' assertion

A. The Defendant is responsible for compensating the Plaintiff for damages B pursuant to Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (hereinafter “the Automobile Accident Compensation Act”) with respect to the instant accident, and the Plaintiff.

arrow