A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 14, 2015, at around 18:20, the Defendant assaulted C, a taxi engineer, at the Defendant’s house located in Sungnam-si, Ma-gu, Ma-dong, B 102, and she was divingd and she returned to C, upon receiving a report of 112 from C, and served as an assaulted by the Defendant, on one occasion, such as the Defendant’s escape complex and the Gabbbbbb, which carried the Defendant on the floor of the Defendant’s house, and broken the Defendant’s her back into the main room, and she was frighted at one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings of the instant case, including the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is divided into one’s own crimes, that there is no same criminal record, that the degree of interference with the execution of official duties is relatively minor.