The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the punishment of the court below for each of the crimes listed in the table of crime Nos. 1 to 12 in the judgment of the court below (the imprisonment of two months for each crime listed in the table of crime Nos. 1 to 12 in the judgment of the court below, and the imprisonment of one month for each crime listed in the table of crime Nos. 13 in the above annexed table of crimes, and the imprisonment of four months for four months, forty hours for a sexual assault treatment program, order to complete a sexual assault treatment program for three years, restriction

2. Although the Defendant was recognized to commit the instant crime, the Defendant was released from the first probation after three days from the date of the release of the Defendant under the first probation even though he was subjected to the suspended sentence twice or more for the same crime, and the crime of this case was committed 33 times from the time of the second suspended sentence, and the period and frequency of the crime were recognified, and there is a high risk of recidivism, and there is no special circumstance or change that can be newly considered in the sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment.

In addition, considering the various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and pleadings of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime was committed, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.