1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months;

Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Although Defendant A is not a narcotics handler, Defendant A received KRW 3 million from B on October 24, 2015, from the back of the E Station located in Doang City D, and 4.72 gram of Mepta (hereinafter referred to as “Melopon”), a local mental medicine, (hereinafter referred to as “Melopon”).

Accordingly, the Defendant sold the Mept Ampha, which is a local mental medicine.

2. Although Defendant B is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant received KRW 3 million from F with the request to purchase phiphones, and received KRW 3 million from A at the same time and place as above, given KRW 3 million to A, and provided F with 4.72g phiphones.

As a result, the defendant assisted the sale and purchase of the Mepta, which is a local mental medicine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement or statement protocol with respect to G (two times);

1. Written reply to a request for appraisal;

1. A protocol of seizure (voluntary submission) (net 20), a list of seizure (net 21);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to calculate additional collection charges;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment for the crime: Articles 60(1)2 and 4(1)1 and 2 subparag. 3(b) of the Narcotics Control Act, and the selection of a sentence for imprisonment;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who observe protection and attend lectures: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: The main sentence of Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. Defendant A: The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. Defendant A of the Provisional Payment Order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act [the scope of the recommended punishment in the sentencing guidelines] - No basic area (one year to two years), including types of two types (mariana, fab, c., etc.) (one year to two years) (i.e., marijuana, fab., and c., etc.) - No person subject to special sentencing [decision of sentence] - The Defendants seems to have attempted to systematically distribute philopon: The defendants appear to have attempted to systematically distribute philopon - A more favorable normal circumstances: the defendants recognized their mistake and reflects the defendants, and the defendants had no history of