1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The circumstances leading to the instant accident are as follows.

On April 27, 2017, at the time of the accident, the insured vehicle A, at the time of the accident, was reduced to five to four lanes in front of the road collision situation in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul at the location of the insured vehicle A, and the insured vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”) operating the four lanes changed to five lanes in order to overtake the two preceding vehicles, and then the two lanes of the foregoing two lanes scheduled to disappear, the insured vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) corresponding to the front one among the above two vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) was placed in the front one, and the driver did not become aware of it in the process, and thus, the part of the Defendant vehicle’s insurance vehicle’s first mother Ri, which violated the Road Traffic Act, 380,000,180, 1000, 200, 300, 200, 10, 30, 20, 20, 30, 10, 20, 30, 40, 20, 20, 1

2. As to the Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident solely occurred due to the negligence of the Defendant’s driver, and that the Plaintiff subrogated the Plaintiff’s claim for damages based on subrogation against the insurer with respect to the part of the damage incurred by the Plaintiff’s insured from the damage of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the Defendant asserted that the instant accident solely resulted from the abnormal overtaking of the Plaintiff’s vehicle on the right side, and solely by the negligence of the

All the accidents occurring in the above facts of recognition, such as the background of the conflict, the degree of conflict, and the shock.