A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On August 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with the performance of official duties in the support for the development of the Suwon method, and on February 22, 2015, the Defendant completed the execution of the said sentence at the Sungsung Vocational Training Correctional Institution.

[Criminal facts] On June 2, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (55) who was seated by D's 'D' located in Susbus C in Boyang-gu Susbus-gu, Manyang-si on the ground that the victim E (55) who was seated by D's 'D' did not mislead the Defendant, and assaulted the victim's face at one time by left hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (report on confirmation of the same criminal history as

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes [Scope of the sentencing guidelines] - The aggravated area of Category 1 (General Violence) (4 months to 1 year): The special aggravated offender: (6) of the same repeated crime (excluding the types of repeated and repeated assault assault during the six types): - The defendant acknowledges his/her mistake: The defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of the same repeated crime like the record of the crime in the judgment of the defendant - Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of the same kind of repeated crime, such as the record of the crime in the judgment of the defendant; the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime; in particular, the defendant was punished for several times for the same crime; the defendant was punished for each assault in the year 2015 and 2016, and he/she again committed the crime of this case and did not agree with the victim.