1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B Co., Ltd. is a company that owns and manages the “D” building, which is a building exclusively used for the parking lot located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si (a total floor area of 13,806.67m2, which is approximately 70.1%, as a parking lot) and is a company that owns and manages the said building. Defendant A is a person who operates the said company.

1. Although the above building, which is a building exclusively used for the parking of Defendant A, maintains a parking lot usage rate of at least 70%, the Defendant used the part of the above building with the third floor of 86 square meters, the fourth floor of 59 square meters, the fifth floor of 79 square meters, and the sixth floor of 61 square meters from the end of 2015 to the end of January 2017 as a warehouse, and the part of the first floor of 266.83 square meters, and the second floor of 266.83 square meters from the beginning of 2016 to the end of January 2017, the Defendant used the part of 818.6 square meters in total as an office, etc., and used it as a warehouse, office, etc., which is not a parking lot, in violation of the parking lot use rate.

2. Defendant B, who is the representative of the Defendant, committed the above violation as to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement by the Defendants (the third public trial date)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing a written accusation, written statement, field offense photograph, civil petition, and official order for correction;

1. Article 29 (2) 1 and Article 2 Subparag. 11 of the Parking Lot Act; Defendant Company A who selects a fine: Articles 31, 29 (2) 1, and 29 (2) 1 and 11 of the Parking Lot Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the fact that part of the standard for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was restored to the original state, the circumstances leading up to the violation, etc.