logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.09.13 2016고단2580
업무상과실치상
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is an intention to operate a “D’s off-the-door department” in the building C in the Young-si Suwon District B.

On January 29, 2015, around 18:37, the Defendant decided to conduct an administration for injection “Flrawls E” when the Defendant complained of a chronic abrupt from the symptoms of the “Flish”, which were taken into account as a normal flick line of the victim E (n, 32 years of age) with the normal flick line of the bones of this title.

The Defendant, while conducting the above injection operation on the back side of the victim's right side, had the victim knife knife sof knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife at the time of the operation. The Defendant, regardless of the victim's will, was sentenced to knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.

2. In order to recognize a doctor’s negligence in a medical accident based on the criteria for recognition of medical malpractice, a doctor’s negligence should be examined if he/she was unable to anticipate the occurrence of the outcome, which was able to avoid the occurrence, but failed to avoid it. In determining the existence of negligence, the degree of common person’s care engaging in the same work and duties should be based on the standard. This is the level of general medical science at the time of the accident, the medical environment and conditions, and the specificity of medical practice.

arrow