A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2015, the Defendant, who misrepresented the lending institution, stated that “The Defendant would make a false entry into and withdrawal from the account on the face of a State by informing the number of account holders, thereby lending KRW 50 million to the account.” On November 16, 2015, the Defendant informed the account number of the Defendant to the person under whose name the account holder was named

On November 17, 2015, at the 09:30 on the 09:30 on the 2015.17.17., the name influor, by calls from the victim C (n, 29 years of age) and sending money to the Seoul Central Inquiry Agency, which was known to the fact that the case was delayed, notified the victim of the bank account under the name of the defendant, and wired KRW 23,000,000 to the above account. On November 17, 2015, the name influor: (a) called the victim E (n, 25 years of age) by calls to the investigation agency; and (b) notified the victim E of the above corporate bank account and the serial number of the bank account in the name of the defendant and wired KRW 49,000,000 on two occasions to the above account.

On November 17, 2015, at around 12:00, the Defendant released KRW 23,000,000 from the point of view that the room located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government was around 12:51, to the employees of the above sub-sponsor, and delivered KRW 24,50,000 to the employees of the above non-sponsor in that it was sent to a company bank near the 12:51 on the same day, around 13:57 on the same day; and KRW 24,50,000 from the point of locking the bank near the 14:34 on the same day, in that it was located in the near the 14:54 on the same day.

In this respect, a name-free person who belongs to the victim C and the victim E, thereby deceiving a total of KRW 72 million from the victims, and the defendant recognized that the loan-related day of this case is illegal because he could not receive a loan of KRW 10 million or more due to his credit rating, but he could not receive a loan of KRW 10 million or more by withdrawing cash as above and delivering it to the name-free persons, thereby making it easier to commit the crime of fraud by the name-free persons.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the second public trial records;

1. Regarding E, G, H, I, and C: