The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around 09:30 on December 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven one ton of cargo vehicles, which are dangerous goods on the road in front of the landing bridge located within the Gyeonggi-do Council in Gwangju-do; (b) discovered the victim C’s truck which the Defendant accused for fraud; (c) was driving the victim’s truck in front of the truck of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle; (d) the part of the victim’s truck in front of the truck of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle; and (e) the part of the victim’s truck in front of the truck of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle was driven by the victim, and (e) the victim’s driver continued to flee due to the escape of the victim C, the part of the victim’s driver’s truck in front of the truck of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, followed the victim C’s vehicle in front

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous articles with the victim, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as catum salt in need of treatment for about three weeks, and suffered injury on the victim D, who is a passenger of the catus car, for about three weeks of medical treatment.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion that the defendant found a vehicle driven by the victim C, who was accused of the fraud, and caused the above victim to suffer bodily injury by shocking the vehicle driven by the above victim two times due to the negligence, and there is no fact that the victims intentionally received the vehicle on board and inflicted bodily injury on the victims.

3. Determination

A. The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial is to be borne by the prosecutor, and the conviction of guilt is to be based on the evidence with probative value that makes a judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is a doubt as to the defendant's guilt, it is inevitable to determine the defendant's interest (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Do735, Apr. 27, 2006). (b) In light of these legal principles, it is consistent with the facts charged in the instant case.