logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2020.12.28 2020가합101558
제명처분무효확인(취소)
Text

The plaintiff's primary claim is dismissed among the lawsuits of this case.

The Defendant’s resolution of May 23, 2020 against the Plaintiff was made.

Reasons

Basic Facts

A. The defendant is a non-corporate group whose members are merchants operating in the Diplomatic Underground shopping mall located in Ansan-gu, Ansan-gu, and the plaintiff is a member of the defendant.

B. During the process of operating a large-scale shopping mall in the vicinity of D basin where the Defendant’s members including the Plaintiff, etc. run, E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) entered into a win-win agreement with the Defendant to provide the Defendant with support of KRW 300,000,000 with the win-win development fund, and KRW 300,000 with the public marketing cost in the event that a joint marketing is conducted after-sale, instead of the Defendant’s cooperation with the salesroom in the Defendant, instead of the Defendant’s cooperation with the salesroom, and paid KRW 300,000,000 with the win-win development fund and the public marketing cost of KRW 300,000 with the public marketing cost around 209. On October 19, 2019, the Defendant decided to divide the amount of KRW 300,000 with the payment of the management fee in the form of paying the management fee.

C. On October 24, 2019, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to convene an extraordinary meeting on the following grounds: (a) on November 24, 2019, the Plaintiff requested the distribution of KRW 300,000,000 and public marketing expenses of KRW 300,000,00; (b) on November 11, 2019, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to convene an extraordinary meeting; (c) on November 11, 2019, the Defendant refused to do so; (d) on January 22, 202, the Plaintiff filed an application for a decision of dismissal from the above court.

On February 7, 2020, some members of the defendant, including the plaintiff's request for disclosure of the details of the execution of the win-win development fund and the plaintiff's resolution of expulsion of the defendant, sent to the defendant a statement of the execution details of the win-win development fund to the defendant and the defendant's request for the list of the quasi-merchants by lending the funds without interest. On the other hand, from the above date and time, for the ordinary people in the vicinity of

arrow