The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that all of the charges of this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine.

In addition, examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, we affirm the court below's rejection of the defendant's claim on the mental and physical disorder on the grounds of the circumstances as stated in its holding.

Meanwhile, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for more than ten years is imposed, an appeal may be filed on the grounds of unfair sentencing. As such, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.