beta
Text
1. The part concerning the conjunctive claim between the plaintiff A and the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;
2. The defendant.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Preliminary Plaintiff A and the net F are co-principals, and the primary Plaintiff B are Plaintiff A’s children.
(hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs” all of the primary and conjunctive plaintiffs
With respect to the real estate listed in the attached list Nos. 1 through 3, 5, and 12 as well as the 17,455 square meters (the entire share of the real estate listed in paragraph (4) of the attached Table) of Cheongong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Daegu District Court, as the receipt of No. 1549 on Mar. 13, 1999, and the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the netF was made on Jan. 20, 199, and the real estate listed in paragraph (9) of the attached Table No. 9 was 2,605 square meters at the time of transfer in the name of F, but was 2,059 square meters at the time of transfer in the name of F;
With respect to the portion of 6,612/17,455 of forest land in the above G G, 17,455 square meters, the same month as the same registry office received on September 7, 2009 6384 square meters
3. The transfer registration under H’s name was completed on the ground of sale and purchase, and only 10,843/17,455 shares of the forest above were left in the name of net F;
(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant real estates” in the separate sheet
The deceased on April 4, 2014, and the deceased on April 4, 2014, there are co-defendant E in the first instance trial, the wife of the deceased F, and the wife of the Defendant and ASEAN.
Attached Form
The registration of transfer of ownership in the defendant's name was made on April 24, 2014 as the receipt of No. 3080 of the above registry office on April 24, 2014 with respect to all real estate listed in the list Nos. 1, 2, 3, 9, and 12, and one-half of each real estate listed in the list No. 6, 7, 8, and 10.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 18 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Judgment as to the main claim
A. On July 12, 2008, Plaintiff B agreed with Plaintiff B to transfer each of the instant real estate to Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff B’s person with parental authority, who is the beneficiary, expressed the intent of profit to the networkF. As such, the networkF is the Plaintiff B.