logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2015.12.03 2015허6510
청구이의
Text

1. The Defendants’ compulsory execution against the Plaintiff on the basis of this Court’s decision on the amount of litigation costs determined.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. The Defendants are entitled to KRW 1,55,777 on March 9, 2015 to the Plaintiff based on the determination of the amount of litigation costs at KRW 1,55,777, respectively, based on the determination of the amount of litigation costs at 2015 Chicago3194.

B. On August 20, 2015, the Defendants issued the Daegu District Court 2015TTT No. 12160 with the above decision as executive title, and issued the seizure and collection order. On the same day, the Defendants served the Daegu Bank, a third debtor, with the seizure and collection order.

C. On September 4, 2015, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 1,555,777, respectively, to the Defendants.

Therefore, the above C.

Since a claim based on the decision of determination of the amount of litigation costs as of March 9, 2015 by this Court upon the deposit for repayment under this subsection has all been extinguished, compulsory execution under this decision shall not be permitted.

2. Articles 208(3)1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act: A judgment without holding any pleadings;

arrow