logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.07 2016고정3224
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and B had worked for the same team at the "D" sales office in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and the victim E was a person who was working as the team leader of the said team.

1. On December 18, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime of December 18, 2015, at the restaurant called “G” located in the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government on December 2015, 2015, the Defendant reported to him/her that he/she had a sense of view, and that he/she had a complaint about having a sense of day-to-day only to B, and that he/she had several persons, such as H, who is the principal of the above restaurant, and that he/she had a view that he/she had lived with the victim even though he/she was not in a internal relationship with the victim, whether he/she had a sense of view that he/she had a view of living with the victim, and whether he/she had a sense of day-to-day only during the year.

“.....”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. The Defendant committed the crime of December 19, 2015 stated that “D” sales offices located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, in December 19, 2015, at around 10:13, 2015, the Defendant provided that “In the middle-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant would live together, and that “In the middle-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Specialized City Specialized City Specialized City Specialized Gu Specialized City Specialized Gu Specialized Gu Specialized Gu Specialized Gu Specialized City Specialized Gu Specialized Gu Specialized City Specialized Gu Specialized Gu Specialized Gu Specialized City Specialized Gu Specialized Gu Specialized Gu Specialized City Specialized Gu Specialized Gu Specialized

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statement protocol (victims) to E;

1. Relevant Article 307 of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow