Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CT 110 Oral Ba.

On November 26, 2013, the Defendant driven the above Oralba on the 19:15th day of November 26, 2013, and led to the flow of the direction from the offside of the D apartment to the direction of the direction of the direction of the flow, depending on the two lanes in front of the yellow Vene-gu, Daegu Suwon-gu.

Since there is a crosswalk in which a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets involved in driving service by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the road, and to safely drive the road in accordance with the new subparagraph.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went beyond the ground floor due to the negligence of disregarding and proceeding the vehicle driving signal even though it had already been stopped, the Defendant’s Otoba left the right-hand side of the victim E (Nam, 11) crossing the crosswalk in accordance with the signals of the crosswalk to the left-hand side.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the left-hand side of the company, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning F;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Investigation report (report on the contents of telephone conversations G);

1. Notification of the result of a signal system;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act to order compliance driving lecture [the scope of recommendation] general traffic accident category 1 (the injury caused by traffic accident) (one to six months) [including special mitigation] punishment and non-execution (including serious efforts to recover from damage] [the decision of sentence] imprisonment without prison labor for six months, suspension of execution of two years, and the accident in this case occurred due to the defendant's violation of signal signal.