The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the representative director of D, and the Defendant, from April 25, 2012 to August 2012, 2012, sold the goods by misrepresenting the goods of F, another, a stock company, at the office of D, Inc., Ltd., which had been located in the E building 503, with the total sales right from F, with the total sales right on the “bloging”, “floging”, and “floging” from F, and selling them on its website or the product placement letter, with the intentional deletion of the trade name of each of the above products from D, thereby selling them.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant denied the instant facts charged to the purport that “Although he/she had served as the representative director of D from October 201 to June 2012, 2012, he/she did not take specific practice, and did not have any fact that he/she had been involved in the instant crime by ordering to delete the trade name of F, or receiving a report from the investigative agency.”

B. The record of this case reveals that around May 201, F Co., Ltd. (F) decided to distribute a product through a firm named “D”, the Defendant’s wife, and the aforementioned “D” was incorporated into D on August 29, 2011 upon the death of G on July 13, 2011. At the time, the Defendant was appointed as the representative director and was in office until June 2012, the Defendant held 80% of the shares, following the existing transaction of “D”, and distributed the products of F Co., Ltd. (F) from around April 201 to April 201. D Co., Ltd. (D’s employees of C Co., Ltd.) sold the products on the website of F Co., Ltd., Ltd. (F) deleted the company’s name and deleted the company’s photograph on its website, and deleted the company’s photograph.