Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 2018, the Defendant: (a) was dispatched from the Defendant’s office in North Korea Kim Jong-si, which was operated by the Defendant, to the said farmer; (b) the victim D, who had been dispatched to the said farmer’s office, “A company failed to purchase pine trees due to the aggravation of temporary distribution; and (c) failed to grow the ling mushroom properly.

If there is a person who can dystroke around it, it will be introduced and changed now.

The production is well-produced, and there is no dispute.

He shall write it without interest only one month after he is celebling.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant, as a bad credit holder at the time, was at least 50 million won in debt to the company, and the 1st year was closely connected with the cafeteria Sweb value and the 2nd year, and even if the Defendant personally borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have an intention or ability to pay the borrowed money in one month, such as he was unable to pay the borrowed money without any specific property.

Nevertheless, on October 17, 2018, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received KRW 5 million from the Defendant’s spouse E-company bank account (F) with the name of the Defendant’s spouse; (c) received KRW 5 million in cash; and (d) received KRW 10 million with the Defendant’s agricultural bank account (H) with the same name around October 20 of the same year; and (c) received KRW 5 million from the Defendant G G under the same name, and received KRW 5 million in cash, such as receiving KRW 5 million in cash.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained a total of KRW 20 million and acquired it by fraud.

2. From the end of October 2018, the Defendant borrowed money to the victim at the place indicated in paragraph 1 at the end of October, 2018, because he was notified of the victim that he would not provide for the number of employees in the event that the personnel expenses of the workers dispatched by the self-support center have not been paid to the self-support center. Accordingly, the Defendant borrowed money to the victim prior to that.