All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The facts charged in this case

A. On March 17, 201, Defendant A was a spouse who has completed the marriage report with C, and (i) was sexual intercourse with B and once at a hotel near the port of Taecheon-gu, Sincheon-gu, Taecheon-gu, Busan on August 18, 2013, and B and once sexual intercourse with B around August 27, 2013, and B and once sexual intercourse with E at the “E” conference located in Seocheon-gu, Sincheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Ocheon-si, and (ii) was sexual intercourse with B and one sexual intercourse with B around August 2013 at the above “E” conference around the end of August 2013, 2013, and (iii) was sexual intercourse with B and one sexual intercourse with B and the above Macheon-gu, Macheon-gu, Ocheon-si, Macheon-si, Macheon-si, Macheon-si, Macheon-si, Macheon-si, 2013.

B. Defendant B is aware that the above A is a spouse.

A. At each date, time, and place indicated in Doshe or paragraphs, each of the foregoing questions was drawn up with A and four times in total.

2. This is a crime falling under Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the spouse's complaint is filed pursuant to Article 241(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the complainant revoked the complaint against the defendant A on November 29, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case, and the revocation of the complaint against the defendant B, who is an accomplice, pursuant to Article 233 of the principle of non-payment of the complaint (Article 233 of the Criminal Procedure Act). Thus, the above part of the indictment against the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(5) of the