A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 15, 2019, at around 18:32, 2019, the Defendant driven CMF5 car on the side of the apartment apartment B, Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and was straight along the two-lanes among the four-lanes in the front line from the front line to the front line. While the Defendant neglected the duty of front lineing, the Defendant was due to occupational negligence, which caused the victim D (Nam, 54 years old), who was under the signal waiting at the front line of the same lane, while neglecting the duty of front lineing, received the rear part of the front line of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the above victim D, such as catitis that requires treatment for about two weeks, and inflicted injury on catum salt, tensions, etc., which requires treatment for about two weeks on the victim F (the 32-year old-old passenger), on the part of the above victim G (the 26-year-old age-old passenger), and inflicted on the same victim G (the 26-year-old passenger) with catum salt, tensions, etc. requiring treatment for about two weeks, and went away from the site without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Each written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of vehicle photographs, accident images, and statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 83 years old, 83 years old, where the Defendant is unable to move to a sanatorium due to alz’s dementia, brusium, brusium, etc., and is hospitalized in a convalescent hospital);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;