1. The punishment against Defendant A shall be six months of imprisonment;

However, for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive against Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around 17:30 on July 4, 2016, around 17:17:30, at the “E restaurant” located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, requested the State to provide alcoholic beverages on credit, and listened to the end of the victim B (59 years of age) who entered the restaurant, and called the victim out of the restaurant, and then called the victim out of the restaurant, and then the victim’s part of the victim’s part was boomed by hand, frighted into the ground, frighted into the breath, frighted into the ground, frighted into the breath part of the restaurant, and threatened the victim’s face and chest part at the end of the restaurant, and then the victim’s part was 10m or less of the victim’s part in treatment on the left part of the 15m or less of the victim’s part on the 7m or less of the victim’s part.

Defendant

A carried these dangerous objects and inflicted injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Joint Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV images;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act.

1. The facts charged against Defendant B, who dismissed the prosecution in accordance with Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, are as follows: Defendant B, around July 4, 2016, at the “Ecafeteria” located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on July 4, 2016, assaulted Defendant B at one time the victim A’s breath, batd with the victim A’s bat, and the batd with the victim A’s bat at hand, and the batd with the batd face.

The crime of violence falls under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and shall not be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under paragraph (3) of the same Article.

Since the victim A expressed his/her intention not to be punished against Defendant B in the court, the prosecution against the assault of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.