1. As to KRW 246,874,519 and KRW 180,00 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 246,874,519 from September 16, 2013 to July 17, 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff, on March 27, 2009, lent to the Defendant KRW 180,000,000 (hereinafter “the first loan”) and KRW 100,000,000 on August 11, 2010 (hereinafter “the second loan”) at each annual interest rate of 6%.

B. On September 6, 2013, the Defendant repaid each of the Plaintiff KRW 50,000,000 (hereinafter “the first repayment”) and KRW 50,000,000 on September 16, 2013 (hereinafter “the second repayment”), and each of the said payments was appropriated for principal upon an agreement between the parties.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the principal of KRW 180,00,000 for the borrowed amount of KRW 180,000 for the borrowed amount [180,000 for the borrowed amount of KRW 100,000 for the second borrowed amount of KRW 100,000 for the second borrowed amount of KRW 50,000 for the second borrowed amount of KRW 50,000 for the second borrowed amount) and the interest calculation amount for the borrowed amount of KRW 246,874,519 for the total of KRW 66,874,519 for the interest or delay damages as stated in the separate calculation of interest for the borrowed amount, and the remaining principal of KRW 180,00,000 for the second borrowed amount of KRW 180,000 for the interest and delay damages from September 16, 2013 to July 17, 2014.

B. As to this, the defendant asserted that the plaintiff and the defendant have not yet reached an agreement on the extension of the due date for the remainder of the loan, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is justified and accepted.