1. The defendant falls under the "amount of admission" in the attached Table 4 "amount of admission by plaintiff" by the plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public announcement - Business name: A housing redevelopment and rearrangement project in the zone A (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Location and size: approximately 59,465 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project area”) in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government - Public inspection and public announcement as to the maintenance and improvement plan - Defendant - AM in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on January 12, 2007 - Public announcement of the project approval (public announcement of the implementation plan): Gangwon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on December 20, 2013

B. Decision of expropriation made on October 27, 2017 by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”): The object of expropriation is as indicated in the column of “subject matter of expropriation” in the annexed list of compensation for loss in attached Form 3.

(hereinafter referred to as "objects subject to expropriation of this case" and individually referred to as "where they are individually named, they shall be specified as Dong and lot number): - The date of commencement of expropriation: December 8, 2017 - Compensation for losses: the same shall apply to the statement in the column of "amount of adjudication for expropriation" in the annexed list of compensation

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on September 20, 2018 (hereinafter “instant objection”) - Compensation for losses: The “amount of objection” in the annexed list of compensation for losses listed in the annexed Table 3 is as indicated.

The appraisal results of this court (hereinafter referred to as "court appraisal") - The appraised value: The appraisal value shall be as stated in the column of "court appraisal amount" in the annexed list 3 compensation.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 8, 20, 29, 30, 32, and 33 (including virtual numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap's appraisal results, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim for increase in compensation

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that the compensation amount for the expropriation of this case and the adjudication on the objection did not reach a reasonable amount of compensation by evaluating the price of the subject matter of expropriation of this case excessively lowers, and in the case of the plaintiffs' assertion 1 "the plaintiff" as shown below, the court's appraisal omitted the corresponding obstacles by the plaintiff's statement (hereinafter "the omitted copies of this case") from the court's appraisal, so it is fair amount of compensation.