logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.01.14 2014구단978
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On August 13, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition to revoke the Plaintiff’s Class 2 ordinary driving license (hereinafter “instant disposition”) by applying Article 93(1)6 of the Road Traffic Act on the ground that the Plaintiff caused six ordinary driving licenses on the ground that while driving B vehicles around 17:30 on June 29, 2014, the Plaintiff did not perform on-site relief measures or duty to report while driving B vehicles (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”).

The plaintiff was under the procedure of the previous trial.

【In the absence of dispute, the Plaintiff stopped the vehicle immediately after the instant traffic accident, provided contact information to the injured party, as it is difficult to think that the injured party suffered injury in light of the circumstances and the response of the injured party, and thus, did not take relief measures. Since the accident scene is a large area of vehicle traffic, the Plaintiff left C at the accident site and parked once in the apartment parking lot under the ground of the Plaintiff’s residence located approximately 70-100 meters away from 70-100 meters away from her work, and there was no escape without taking relief measures. (ii) The Plaintiff’s driver’s license is essential for the purpose of carrying out his work, and thus, the instant disposition is unlawful disposition that goes beyond the scope of appropriate discretion, and thus ought to be revoked.

Judgment

1. First of all, according to the evidence as seen earlier, the Plaintiff did not take any relief measures or report to the victims while causing the instant traffic accident with his own vehicle and leaving the scene of the accident without reporting the victims. The Plaintiff did not return to the scene of the accident after leaving the scene of the accident. The Plaintiff did not take any relief measures against the passenger of the Plaintiff’s vehicle remaining at the scene of the accident, and the injury resulting from the instant traffic accident is anticipated at the time.

arrow