1. The Defendant ordered the Plaintiff to 7th 705 square meters of Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon (101.655 square meters), and the said building from August 10, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 31, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on a deposit deposit of KRW 10 million, KRW 1 million, monthly rent of KRW 1 million, and between June 10, 2017 and June 9, 2018, with respect to the building of this case, Seo-gu, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant building”), and ordered the instant building upon receiving a deposit deposit of the Defendant.

B. From August 10, 2017, the Defendant was in arrears with the monthly rent from August 10, 2017, and was in arrears with the monthly rent of October 10, 2017.

C. On October 11, 2017, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the termination of the said lease agreement.

[Grounds for recognition] The descriptions of Gap 1, 2-1, 2, and 3 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since the above lease contract was terminated, the defendant is obligated to order the plaintiff to restore the building of this case to its original state, and pay the plaintiff the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated by the ratio of one million won per month from August 10, 2017 to the completion date of the designation of the above building.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified.