logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.06.25 2014고단566
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of buses C.

On December 14, 2013, the Defendant driving a bus on the 15:15th day of December, 2013, and driving the bus on the 15:15th day, and driving one lane in front of the sub-section in front of the sub-section in front of the sub-section in the Yan-Eup, the address population at the time of the city from the Burland to the 50km away from the Burland.

The Defendant, while driving a roadside while driving on the road at such speed as above, was driven by the victim D(55 years old) who was frighting to the center line due to the negligent negligence, received the front part of the left part of the bus left side of the bus of the Defendant.

The Defendant suffered injury to 24 victims as stated in the list of crimes in the attached Form (the age and degree of injury of some victims stated in the indictment shall be deemed to be clerical error) including that the victim suffered from a diveralone-day therapy that requires approximately 8 weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Each written confirmation of medical treatment;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in written opinions;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of a fine by taking into account all the circumstances, such as the selection of a sentence, confession and reflection thereof, subscription to a comprehensive insurance, absence of any record of punishment in connection with a traffic accident, the victim D, and the fact that an accused has suffered serious injury due to the traffic accident in this case;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow