The judgment of the court below on the guilty portion of the judgment of the court below and the forgery of private documents and the uttering of falsified documents.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

1) The forged document written in the facts charged in this case, which was written on April 5, 2009, was forged and used for the forgery of the private document and the uttering of the falsified investigation document, and C testified that the defendant signed in blank, which is not a "pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-en".

Of the facts charged in each of the instant charges of unfair sentencing, the punishment imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (one million won of fine) on the premise that the crime of forging private documents in the name of C, the crime of uttering of a falsified private document, the crime of false entry in the original of an authentic deed, and the crime of uttering of the original of an authentic deed is not guilty,

Judgment

Around April 5, 2009, the Defendant’s summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) at the F judicial scrivener office located in Gwangju-dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, the Defendant: (b) around April 5, 2009, the office G used to have the head of the office G own the H clan; (c) ① 114,744m2, 14,744m2, 747m2, 747m2, 747m2, 3, 1,402m2, 1,402m2, all of the above real property in the instant case.

(2) The above real estate shall be donated to D clans, and (3) to L, M, and N.