A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

Punishment of the crime

" 2015 Gohap 89"

1. On April 2015, the Defendant met the Victim C, which was the victim, who was known from around 2009, in a mutual influencing restaurant located in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si, and was to take over the re-insurance company at the time of B. However, the Defendant would be able to use the money as investment funds, and then 10% of the monthly profit after making a loan to B.

“Falsely speaking to the purport that “” was false, and thereafter, at an interval of locks, the victim was spawn at the coffee platform in Gangseo-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and the victim was allowed to talk with the same intent, or the victim was lent money to the same effect.

However, around that time, there was no plan to accept the re-insurance company at the time of the defendant, and the defendant had already been liable to pay the above 400 million won or more to the above victims, and the victim had a accumulated obligation of 1 billion won or more to many creditors, such as E,F, and G, and even if he borrowed money from others in the absence of any specific income, even if he borrowed money from others in the absence of any other income, he thought to manage the so-called fund by preventing so-called return, such as repayment of debts to other creditors, etc., by investing the money in other businesses, and did not have any intent or ability to pay the profits to the victim or to repay the money of the victim.

Nevertheless, on June 18, 2015, the Defendant had received KRW 160 million from the victim by deceiving the victim as above, and then received KRW 160 million from the account in the name of the Defendant in the location of Gangseo-si, Chungcheongnam-si on June 18, 2015 to the account in the name of the Defendant and received KRW 160 million from that time until September 8, 2015.

" 2016 Gohap 9

2. On September 1, 2015, the Defendant called the victim E, a person who was aware of the usual place in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, at a non-permanent place, and called the victim E, who was not a member of the city. As such, the Defendant only lent KRW 20 million.