A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving QM5 vehicles.

1. On October 29, 2016, the Defendant was found to have driven a motor vehicle while under influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol at the entrance of the C police box, sent to the entrance of the 4th main apartment parking lot, by large construction, after having received a traffic accident report from the 83 Construction Station at the 83 Construction Agency, Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, on October 29, 2016, by arresting the Defendant and drinking alcohol in the course of investigation.

There is a reasonable reason to determine the person, and the defendant voluntarily accompanied the E system of the Seongbuk Police Station, and requested the measurement of drinking on three occasions, but the police officer did not comply with the request for measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the main sentence) and the Road Traffic Act (the action following an accident) led to the speed of about 40 kilometers a speed of about 40 kilometers a speed of 10 kilometers a speed of 50 kilometers a speed of 50 kilometers a speed of 83-day, Daegu-gu, a Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, to the right side of the erosctic road, along the two-lanes of the road.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system in a way that well examines the steering direction and the right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was driven by the victim F (47 tax) in front of the Defendant’s driving vehicle, and found late any Ghoer vehicle in front of the Defendant’s driving vehicle and did not avoid the vehicle, thereby receiving the back part of the said vehicle as the front part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

Due to its shock, the victim H (V, 44 years old) operating in front of the foregoing vehicle as well as in front of the foregoing vehicle was pushed down in the future, and led the victim H (V, 4 years old) to blick back the driver.

As a result, the Defendant’s negligence in performing the above duties requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim F.