1. The part of the judgment of the court below against Defendant A is reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 검사 1) 사실오인(피고인 A에 대한 이유무죄 부분) 피고인 A은 대포계좌를 수령하여 피해금원을 송금하는 방식으로 보이스피싱 범행에 가담하여 그 피해금을 가로챈다는 인식이 분명히 있었던 것으로 보이고, 설령 확정적 고의는 없었다 하더라도 이를 충분히 의심할 수 있었던 상황에서 가로채는 금원이 보이스피싱 피해금이더라도 상관없다는 미필적 고의를 가지고 있었던 것으로 보임에도, 이 부분 공소사실을 무죄로 인정한 원심판단에는 사실을 오인하여 판결에 영향을 미친 잘못이 있다. 2) 양형부당 피고인들에 대한 원심의 형(피고인 A : 징역 6월, 피고인 B : 징역 4월, 집행유예 1년)이 너무 가벼워서 부당하다.

B. Defendant A1) misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles (hereinafter referred to as “D”), the above Defendant did not recognize the principal offender’s crime of Bophishing fraud, and did not have any negligence that facilitate the above fraud. Therefore, even if the above Defendant had intention, the act of withdrawing and remitting the money of the above Defendant was committed after the completion of the crime of Bophishing fraud, it shall not be regarded as an aiding and abetting the crime of fraud. Nevertheless, the lower court’s decision that found the Defendant guilty of this part of the charges without changing the indictment was unlawful, and thus, it is erroneous in that the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. 2) In so doing, the lower court’s punishment against the above Defendant is too unreasonable as it was too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. This part of the Prosecutor’s assertion of mistake of facts