logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.26 2017고단7439
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is that from November 1, 2016, the Defendants had a tent farming in front of the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D emotional health.

1. From August 2, 2017 to around 10:20 on the same day, Defendant A expressed a bath on the ground that the police officer, who was the police officer of the Seoul Local Police Agency E National Police Agency, dispatched to the request of the public official of the Gu office to remove illegal tents through administrative vicarious execution in front of the foregoing D’s 10:42 on the same day, Defendant A walked the above F’s bridge on the bridge and obstructed the above F’s legitimate performance of official duties concerning the maintenance of public safety and order by putting the B above the floor in a work-based manner using the left shoulder part, and obstructing the above F’s legitimate performance of official duties concerning the maintenance of public order.

2. Defendant B expressed a bath on the ground that Defendant B, in front of the above day-to-day, had removed illegal tents through administrative vicarious execution, on the ground that Defendant B, a police official belonging to the Seoul Regional Police Agency E-General of the Seoul Regional Police Agency, called for the Defendant’s arms, was taken by the Defendant at the request of the public official of the Gu office, and, as a result, walking the above G’s Hebbucks and the spacker part of the said G’s buckbucks, walking over the next floor once, and continuously obstructed the above F and G’s legitimate execution of public duties by walking the parts, the parts, and the shoulder part of the said F’s bucks and the shoulders, one time at the demand of the public official of the Gu office, thereby interfering with the public safety and order.

1. According to the records of recognition, the following facts are recognized.

A. On August 2, 2017, public officials in charge of the administrative vicarious execution of the Gu office requested the Seoul Local Police Agency to provide support for the administrative vicarious execution to remove illegal tent installed for the purpose of tent farming, and the said administrative vicarious execution was completed before the instant facts charged were created.

B. While the Defendants reported in advance to the competent police station to hold an assembly at the same place on the same day, they still remain at the site even after the completion of the administrative vicarious execution of the Gu office, such as the preceding paragraph, as in the case of the preceding paragraph, and the police officers belonging to the Seoul Regional Police Station E, namely, the Defendants.

arrow