logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.22 2019고단7176
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B In the name of “I” and “J” under the name of “I” and “J” for a total of five rooms, such as the heading, E, F, G, and H, of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Building C, and the Defendant is a head of office who provides customers’ reservation, guidance, and collection during the week.

No one shall arrange sexual traffic, such as sexual intercourse or similar sexual intercourse, in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables or other property benefits from unspecified persons.

Nevertheless, from August 6, 2019 to October 14, 2019, B and the Defendant also advertised “K” and “L”, which is an advertising site of sexual traffic at the said sexual traffic business establishment from around August 6, 2019, and provided guidance to the above heading room where female employees are waiting, such as M and N, after receiving KRW 150,00 to KRW 180,000 in the price for sexual traffic from male customers who contacted with the advertisement.

As a result, the defendant conspired with B to arrange commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol ofO, M, P, or N;

1. Each protocol of seizure and each protocol of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to business places, advertising photographs, control site photographs, Kakakao Copyright dialogue content, short-term use contract, mobile phone text messages, and copy of lease contract;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with labor, or imprisonment with labor;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines (decision of types) shall be limited to the scope of recommendations (decision of types) according to the sentencing guidelines, the mediation, etc. of commercial sex acts subject to the age of 19 or older, and there shall be no mediation, etc. of commercial sex acts [the category 2] by business, receipt of prices, etc. [the scope of recommendations and recommendations] basic area, six months through one year and four months;

2. The role of the defendant in the decision-making of sentence is not easy and the period of participation is not shorter.

However, the defendant has recognized his mistake before.

arrow