Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 2,500,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On July 22, 2010, in collusion with E and F where the Defendant was aware of the victim D, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The victim D would be a multiple employee,” the above F would receive the payment from the next side, and the Defendant also made a false statement to the effect that “The victim would be a multiple employee.”

However, even if the Defendant received advance payment from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to work as an employee from the above multilateral bank, and the above F and E were well aware of such fact.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired it by deception by the victim, that is, by the victim, after being issued two million won from the victim.

B. Around September 3, 2010, the Defendant against the victim I made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant will faithfully work for the victim as an employee of the multi-faceted employee,” which was operated by the victim I in the Audio Group J of the Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do.

However, even if the defendant receives the advance payment from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to work as an employee in the above multiples.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 5 million won in advance from the victim to the account of community credit cooperatives under his/her name on the same day, and acquired it by fraud.

2. Around September 6, 2010, Defendant B made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant will faithfully work as a multilateral employee from the day on which the Plaintiff was placed in his/her own face” to the victim in the Nda operated by the Victim M in Chungcheongnam-Nam L.

However, even if the defendant receives the advance payment from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to work as an employee in the above multiples.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.