Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At both weeks, the defendant is in office in the "D Co., Ltd." located in C, and is between the victim E and the workplace partner.

While the Defendant was not a good dispute with the victim, on September 2016, at the request of the victim in the first team packing room of the above company's production 1 team of the above company, the Defendant: “In the presence of the Defendant and the victim, the Victim F of the company fee and G are in order to assist the settlement of the victim.”

In a large sense, “the victim was openly insultingd.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. A complaint and an investigative report (absent to the search of the relevant case);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. As to the issue of the main text of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant did not have any desire for the victim as stated in the facts charged in this case.

In other words, the victim E, from the investigative agency to this court, prepared a place for settlement by G, which is the head of the team, F, and the head of the team, who is a head of the team, to the extent that the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, was integrated into the following circumstances: (i) the victim E, from the investigative agency to the court, would not have a settlement by stating, “The defendant would not have been able to “a two-year son, a two-year son, a hushed, and a hushed.”

It is relatively specific and consistent in the situation at the time of “I am away” to the effect that “I am away,” and ② in this court F and G, the witness of the case, “I am to the compromise of the defendant and the victim. I am to the victim “I am to die in a low-year period.”

“A settlement shall not be made with the words “a settlement”.