logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.18 2016고합864
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Gohap 864"

1. The defendant who violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) intends to purchase money and gold in exchange for money created as political expenses to the people together with C;

In order to obtain money by fraud, the defendant pretended to the custodian of the old money and the gold tamp, and C shared the role of the buyer in the color of the buyer.

C Pursuant to the above public offering, around November 25, 2009, around 11:30, at the mutual infinite coffee shop in the first floor of the building underground of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government DD Building, the victim E knows a person who is in custody of the money and gold in the face of the previous regime with the money and gold.

500 million won per week, 10,000 won per annum and 400,000 won in total, and 1 kilogram30,000 won in market value.

The Government made a false statement to the effect that 10 gold bars will be paid.

However, the defendant and C did not have money or gold bullion and did not have the intention or ability to supply money or gold bullion, even if they received the purchase price from the victim because they did not know whether they exist or not.

Accordingly, in collusion with C, the Defendant deceivingd the victim as above and obtained five copies of the KRW 500 million check from the victim on the same day.

2. The Defendant, together with C, wanting to supply a group of people to whom he/she had provided a group of people

In order to obtain money by fraud, the defendant is the original supplier of one sheet, and C bears the role of typizing the purchaser.

(a) On August 20, 2010, C made a false statement to the victim F at the coffee shop located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, to the effect that “I know that I would know that I would pay money, and will supply the original group within three hours of payment.”

However, since the defendant and C did not have a single source because they are not only one supplier, they intend to supply a single source of money even if they receive money from the injured party.

arrow