A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On November 2011, 2010, the Defendant, by deceiving a customer center counselor, who is not aware of the name of the victim corporation as he/she was C, applied for the re-issuance of one credit card (credit card No. D) under C by deceiving the customer center counselor, who is not aware of the name of the victim corporation as he/she was C, from the Haman's Haman's Haman's Habon, on which he/she knew of personal information, such as the credit card number, password, home address, mobile phone number, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings employees who could not know the name of the victim company, and acquired the above credit card as property from the victim company.

B. On October 2015, the Defendant who acquired credit cards through deception on October 1, 2015: (a) 1-A from the Habman’s domination on October 2015.

In the same manner as the victim corporation, one of the employees could not know the name of the one card, and applied for the re-issuance of the above C Credit Card (Credit Card Number E) from the victim corporation.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings employees who could not know the name of the victim company, and acquired the above credit card as property from the victim company.

C. On May 1, 2014, the Defendant received food equivalent to KRW 25,00,00 from F located in the F where the goods were purchased by using credit cards, and thereafter, Article 1-A.

The payment was made by using the credit card in the name of C, which was illegally issued.

However, the credit card in fact is the 1-A.

As stated above, a card issued without the consent of the nominal C as the nominal owner did not have the intent or ability to pay the price normally even if the defendant was provided with food by using the credit card as above, as well as the fact that the defendant is not a legitimate user.

Nevertheless, the defendant received food as above, and settled the price with a credit card in the name of C, and let one card company of the victim, which is unaware of the fact, pay the price.