1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the third-party 15 to 12, among the judgment of the court of first instance, are the same as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this Court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. We seek revocation of the instant loan agreement on the forest land of this case, which is administrative property, on the premise that it is an administrative disposition subject to administrative litigation since the instant loan agreement was substantially permitted to use and profit from the instant property under the Public Property Act and the cancellation of the instant loan agreement is revoked. However, the following circumstances are as follows: ① on August 30, 2010, the Defendant discovered that the Plaintiff occupied the forest of this case without permission and imposed indemnity on the Plaintiff; ② on the Defendant, around December 12, 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendant applied for renewal of the loan agreement under Article 31 of the Public Property Act on the premise that the instant forest falls under the general property of this case; ② on the ground that the Defendant concluded the loan agreement in accordance with the above provision, notified the parties that the contract was also concluded, and thus, the Defendant concluded the loan agreement of this case with the intention to terminate the loan agreement of this case as the subject of administrative property of this case, and ③ on the premise that the agreement of this case was concluded before the termination of the loan agreement of this case.