logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.12.13 2018고단4814
강제추행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 3, 2018, the Defendant, at around 10:35, 10:35, laid off the victim D (n, 25 years of age) who was the revenue owner of the above studio in front of the elevator of the 1studio C, which is owned by the Defendant in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 2018, and laid down his arms, laid off the victim’s da and the victim’s luxle, and kid the victim into the victim’s lux, kids, kid the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (explosion of site and attaching photographs to site photographs);

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to attend a lecture;

1. In full view of various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, occupation, family environment, social ties, risk of recidivism, order to disclose and notify, order to disclose and take preventive measures against the Defendant’s personal information, and disadvantage and side effect resulting therefrom, there are special circumstances in which the Defendant’s personal information shall not be disclosed or notified, and order to restrict employment should not be issued, pursuant to Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) proviso of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from an employment restriction order, the proviso to Article 49(1), the proviso to Article 50(1), and the proviso to Article 56(1) (the proviso to Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

In a case where a conviction is finalized on a crime of indecent act committed in the judgment that is subject to registration and submission of new information, the Defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to the competent agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act.

In spite of the indecent act of the victim who is the tenant with the age of 48 who is the main owner of the reason for sentencing, the victim's complaint is closed.

arrow