A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 03:10 on January 9, 2016, the Defendant driven CK5 cars at the section of about 1.5 km from the roads near the hotel distance in the city of Jeju to the roads near the Seoul Gas charging Station in the city of Jeju, with no driver's license for the vehicle around 03:10 on January 9, 2016.

On March 24, 2016, the Defendant driven CK5 vehicle without a driver's license in the section of approximately 1.5 km from the road near the present high school located in the 101-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong to around 861.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 86"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A driver's license inquiry;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving without a license: "2016 Highest 500";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting the circumstances of driving without licenses;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The circumstances that are favorable to the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution taking into account the following circumstances as the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the same Act: The facts of the crime are recognized and reflected, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than the fine, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than the fine, the fact that there is three times due to drinking, three times due to a non-exclusive driving, and three times due to a non-exclusive driving, and the fact that the driving of this case is not good, and in particular, the fact that the case was committed while being tried in the instant case on the top of 2016 highest 50 cases at 86 highest 2016 high speed : The fact that the driving of this case was in a state of drinking, although it was below the standard level set by the Traffic Act at the time of driving in the instant case (0.40% of the blood alcohol level among the blood alcohol level) and the circumstances, circumstances, etc. of the defendant.