A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 22, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for embezzlement in the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of Suwon branch of the Defendant, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 25, 2017.

On December 2, 2014, the Defendant became aware of the victim's visit to a restaurant where the victim C (V, 23 years of age) had worked as a guest. After introducing the victim as university professor and pastor, the victim was able to be friendly by providing sexual intercourse or providing career counseling. In the process, the Defendant borrowed a small amount of money from the victim.

1. Around November 2016, fraud Defendant: (a) exercised the right to operate a coffee shop to the victim that considers the course in “E” located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; and (b) did not put one million won as a security deposit.

In addition, because money may require more, 500,000 won will be able to operate a coffee shop.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not find out a coffee shop for the victim. At that time, the defendant did not have any fixed import as a bad credit, and used it only for personal purposes, such as the cost of living of the injured person, and even if he received money from the injured person, he did not have the intent or ability to have the injured person operate the coffee shop.

Nevertheless, on November 21, 2016, the Defendant received 4,700,000 won from the injured party under the name of a coffee shop deposit, etc. with the bank account (Account Number: G) of the F of the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On January 13, 2017, the defrauded Defendant used the credit card to play a coffee shop in the “E” located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si on January 13, 2017, and then deposits the credit card later.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant is a person of bad credit standing at that time.