The sentence of each sentence against the Defendants shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendants are in the relationship between the victim D and the victim.

At around 11:50 on June 14, 2012, the Defendants: (a) obstructed the front of the victim D (the victim’s age of 34) who passed his location in front of the Ma apartment in the Simsan-si, Simsan-si; (b) “The victim saw the victim’s me at the same age as the old, the same year as the old, smelled, smelled in the mouth, snick, and the old,” and (c) Defendant B laid the handphone in the name of the Republic of Korea; and (d) caused the victim’s left hand in order to cut off the cell phone in which the victim was in his left hand, and in this case, Defendant A saw the victim’s hand and frighted the victim’s hand, thereby shouldering the victim’s unfolding the victim’s number of days of treatment, humfing the son, humfing it with the victim’s hand.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

The police interrogation protocol, slope F’s statement, and assistant F’s statement about the Defendants [this case’s case’s case’s case was a case in which G filed a divorce and consolation money lawsuit against the victims, etc. on the ground of unlawful act, and the Defendants committed a case in the course of committing a crupt of the victim’s cell phone as of the date when G met with G in order to examine CCTV evidence. Although the Defendants were only taking place with a cell phone, the Defendants are denied to commit a crime, the facts charged in this case’s case’s case is judged guilty in full view of the above

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.: Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of sentence: 30,000 won (the period of detention in a workhouse: 50,000 won a day); each fine of 30,000 won (the period of detention in a workhouse: 50,000 won a day);