A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for three months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Jeonju District Court, and on March 13, 2015, the same court sentenced eight months to imprisonment for fraud, etc., and completed the execution of each sentence at the Jeonju District Court on January 14, 2016. On November 24, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to five months of imprisonment for fraud in the Gwangju District Court’s Netcheon Branch Branch Branch, and currently the appellate court was proceeding in the Gwangju District Court’s trial on November 24, 2016. On March 22, 2016, the appellate court: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant, at the O station operated by the Victim N, who is located in Seodong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Gwangju District Court on March 22, 2016; (c) the Defendant, despite having no intent and ability to pay the price, was provided with the price by deceiving KRW 805 and 500.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police accused;

1. Statement statement made to N by the police;

1. References to inquiries, reports on the unclaimed previous records and results thereof, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on personal expropriation;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes [the scope of recommending punishment] In the case where the risk of occurrence of damage is not significantly realized (i.e., special mitigation) in the mitigation area (i.e., one month to one year), the mitigation area (i.e., special mitigation), / the same repeated crime (determination of sentencing) or more for the same type of repeated crime (decision of sentencing).