logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.09.08 2016고단4626
사기
Text

1. Defendant A

A. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

B. Defendant A did not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court on July 5, 2012 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern District Court on February 17, 2013.

[Criminal facts] Defendant A is the representative director of the F Co., Ltd. F of the Real Estate Development Bank, a real estate development company located in the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-si, and Defendant B is between the above A and the Go-gu.

Defendant

B On April 23, 2015, the victim I was operating a company under the real estate development in the Gyeonggi-do. At present, the national industrial complex is being developed in the vicinity of the Pyeongtaek-gu in Gyeonggi-do.

Compensation is already completed and is expected to begin the project, and it is one time to make an investment.B, a considerable amount of money (200 million won) has been invested.

“ and recommended investment.”

After that, on May 2, 2015, the Defendants met the victim at the coffee shop near Daegu-dong, Daegu-gu, and the Defendant A created a national industrial complex in Pyeongtaek-gu, and the Defendant started immediately after the compensation was completed.

In short of business funds, KRW 90,000,000 shall be repaid to KRW 100,000 after four months, and when entering the removed construction, KRW 100,000 shall be paid additionally.

And as security, the registration of the establishment of a collateral security will be made for the land and building of Pyeongtaek-gunJ in Gyeonggi-do.

Defendant B made a false statement to the effect that it is “,” and Defendant B also made an investment in money.

The lending of money will be responsible for 100% of the amount of money.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, Defendant A was unable to order the removal of the project for the creation of the Pyeongtaek-si National Industrial Complex, and there was no right in relation thereto, and in the case of the construction site of the KR publicly notified Kanam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, the construction work is properly conducted due to the reasons such as the auction procedure for the land and buildings.

arrow