The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the reasons for appeal (10 years of imprisonment, 80 hours of order) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment revealed that the defendant made confession of all the crimes in this court when he made a confession, and the victim presented a statement of withdrawal of complaint and written agreement to the defendant, etc. to the effect that he appeared as a witness in the court of original instance and made it difficult to understand the victim's genuine will about the defendant's tolerance by submitting a written application to the court of original instance to the effect that he would have disturbed the defendant's wife again. The victim expressed his intention to the effect that the defendant, his father through the victim's attorney-at-law, recognized the defendant's mistake and speaks against the defendant. The defendant had no record of punishment more than the criminal records or suspended execution before the case, and that this court has taken advantage of the defendant's statements to his family, such as the victim and children, while submitting a written application to the defendant's wife over several times.

However, the Defendant, as her father and her father, had been able to care and care by making best efforts to grow up well even under her father and slock due to parents’ divorce, but was not at the time of the first crime and committed attempted rape, attempted rape, forced indecent act and assaulting the victim who was 12 years old.

The crime of this case was committed 15 times in the crime of rape and attempted rape for a period of two years, and 6 times in the crime of forced indecent act, and sexual assault of the victim continuously and repeatedly, and its nature is extremely poor, and its possibility of criticism is very high.

The victim seems to have suffered serious sexual humiliation and mental impulse due to these anti-humane crimes of the defendant, and in fact, it is unclear.